Phone data jammer program | handheld phone jammer block

Permanent Link to Innovation: Reducing the Jitters
Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 6
Loc: **
Offline

Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 36
Loc: **
Chip-scale atomic clock. How a Chip-Scale Atomic Clock Can Help Mitigate Broadband Interference Small low-power atomic clocks can enhance the performance of GPS receivers in a number of ways, including enhanced code-acquisition capability that precise long-term timing allows. And, it turns out, such clocks can effectively mitigate wideband radio frequency interference coming from GPS jammers. We learn how in this month’s column. By Fang-Cheng Chan, Mathieu Joerger, Samer Khanafseh, Boris Pervan, and Ondrej Jakubov INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM is a marvel of science and engineering. It has become so ubiquitous that we are starting to take it for granted. Receivers are everywhere. In our vehicle satnav units, in our smart phones, even in some of our cameras. They are used to monitor the movement of the Earth’s crust, to measure water vapor in the troposphere, and to study the effects of space weather. They allow surveyors to work more efficiently and prevent us from getting lost in the woods. They navigate aircraft and ships, and they help synchronize mobile phone and electricity networks, and precisely time financial transactions. GPS can do all of this, in large part, because the signals emitted by each satellite are derived from an onboard atomic clock (or, more technically correct, an atomic frequency standard). The signals from all of the satellites in the GPS constellation need to be synchronized to within a certain tolerance so that accurate (conservatively stated as better than 9 meters horizontally and 15 meters vertically, 95% of the time), real-time positioning can be achieved by a receiver using only a crystal oscillator. This requires satellite clocks with excellent long-term stability so that their offsets from the GPS system timescale can be predicted to better than about 24 nanoseconds, 95% of the time. Such a performance level can only be matched by atomic clocks. The very first atomic clock was built in 1949. It was based on an energy transition of the ammonia molecule. However, it wasn’t very accurate. So scientists turned to a particular energy transition of the cesium atom and by the mid-1950s had built the first cesium clocks. Subsequently, clocks based on energy transitions of the rubidium and hydrogen atoms were also developed. These initial efforts were rather bulky affairs but in the 1960s, commercial rack-mountable cesium and rubidium devices became available. Further development led to both cesium and rubidium clocks being compact and rugged enough that they could be considered for use in GPS satellites. Following successful tests in the precursor Navigation Technology Satellites, the prototype or Block I GPS satellites were launched with two cesium and two rubidium clocks each. Subsequent versions of the GPS satellites have continued to feature a combination of the two kinds of clocks or just rubidium clocks in the case of the Block IIR satellites. While it is not necessary to use an atomic clock with a GPS receiver for standard positioning and navigation applications, some demanding tasks such as geodetic reference frame monitoring use atomic frequency standards to control the operation of the receivers. These standards are external devices, often rack mounted, connected to the receiver by a coaxial cable—too large to be embedded inside receivers. But in 2004, scientists demonstrated a chip-scale atomic clock, and by 2011, they had become commercially available. Such small low-power atomic clocks can enhance the performance of GPS receivers in a number of ways, including enhanced code-acquisition capability that precise long-term timing allows. And, it turns out, such clocks can effectively mitigate wideband radio frequency interference coming from GPS jammers. We learn how in this month’s column. “Innovation” is a regular feature that discusses advances in GPS technology and its applications as well as the fundamentals of GPS positioning. The column is coordinated by Richard Langley of the Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick. He welcomes comments and topic ideas. Write to him at lang @ unb.ca. Currently installed Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) ground receivers have experienced a number of disruptions in GPS signal tracking due to radio frequency interference (RFI). The main sources of RFI were coming from the illegal use of jammers (also known as personal privacy devices [PPD]) inside vehicles driving by the ground installations. Recently, a number of researchers have studied typical properties of popular PPDs found in the market and have concluded that the effect of PPD interference on the GPS signal is nearly equivalent to that of a wideband signal jammer, to which the current GPS signal is most vulnerable. This threat impacts LAAS or any ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) in two ways: Continuity degradation — as vehicles with PPDs pass near the GBAS ground antennas, the reference receivers lose lock due to the overwhelming noise power.  Integrity degradation — the code tracking error will increase when the noise level in the tracking loop increases. Numerous interference mitigation techniques have been studied for broadband interference. The interference mitigation methods can be separated according to the two fundamental stages of GPS signal tracking: the front-end stage, in which automatic gain control and antenna nulling/beam forming techniques are relevant, and the baseband stage, where code and carrier-tracking loop algorithms and aiding methods are applicable. In our current work, the baseband strategy and resources that are practically implementable at GBAS ground stations are considered. Among those resources, we focus on using atomic clocks to mitigate broadband GNSS signal interference. For GPS receivers in general, wide tracking loop bandwidths are used to accommodate the change in signal frequencies and phases caused by user dynamics. Unfortunately, wide bandwidths also allow more noise to enter into the tracking loop, which will be problematic when wideband inference exists. The general approach to mitigate wideband interference is to reduce the tracking loop bandwidth. However, a reference receiver employing a temperature-compensated crystal oscillator (TCXO) needs to maintain a minimum loop bandwidth to track the dynamics of the clock itself, even when all other Doppler effects are removed. The poor stability of TCXOs fundamentally limits the potential to reduce the tracking loop bandwidth. This limitation becomes much less constraining when using an atomic clock at the receiver, especially in the static, vibration-free environment of a GBAS ground station. Integrating atomic clocks with GPS/GNSS receivers is not a new idea. Nevertheless, the practical feasibility of such integration remained difficult until recent advancements in atomic clock technology, such as commercially available compact-size rubidium frequency standards or, more recently, chip-scale atomic clocks (CSACs). Most of the research using atomic clock integrated GPS receivers aims to improve positioning and timing accuracy, enhance navigation system integrity, or coast through short periods of satellite outages. In these applications, the main function of the atomic clock is to improve the degraded system performance caused by bad satellite geometries. As for using narrower tracking loop bandwidths to obtain better noise/jamming-resistant performance, the majority of work in this area has focused on high-dynamic user environments with extra sensor aiding, such as inertial navigation systems, pseudolites, or other external frequency-stable radio signals. These aids alone do not permit reaching the limitation of tracking loop bandwidth reduction since the remaining Doppler shift from user dynamics still needs to be tracked by the tracking loop itself. Our research intends to explore the lower end of the minimum tracking loop bandwidth for static GPS/GNSS receivers using atomic clocks. High-frequency-stability atomic clocks naturally reduce the minimum required bandwidth for tracking clock errors (since clock phase random variations are much smaller). We have conducted analyses to obtain the theoretical minimum tracking loop bandwidths using clocks of varying quality. Carrier-phase tracking loop performance under deteriorated C/N0 conditions (that is, during interference) was investigated because it is the most vulnerable to wideband RFI. The limitations on the quality of atomic clocks and on the receiver tracking algorithms (second- or third-order tracking loop bandwidths) to achieve varying degrees of interference suppression at the GBAS reference receivers are explored. The tracking loop bandwidth reductions and interference attenuations that are achievable using different qualities of atomic clocks, including CSACs and commercially available rubidium receiver clocks, are also discussed in this article. In addition to the theoretical analyses, actual GPS intermediate frequency (IF) signals have been sampled using a GPS radio frequency (RF) frond-end kit, which is capable of utilizing external clock inputs, connected to a commercially available atomic clock. The sampled IF data are fed into a software receiver together with and without simulated wideband interference to evaluate the performance of interference mitigation using atomic clocks. The wideband interference is numerically simulated based on deteriorated C/N0. The actual tracking errors generated from real IF data are used to validate the system performance predicted by the preceding broadband interference mitigation analyses. Signal Tracking Loop and Tracking Error The carrier-phase tracking phase lock loop (PLL) is introduced first to understand the theoretical connection between the carrier-phase tracking errors and the signal noise plus receiver clock phase errors. A simplified PLL is shown in FIGURE 1 with incoming signals set to zero. In the figure, n(s), c(s), and δθ(s) are receiver white noise, clock phase error or clock disturbance, and tracking loop phase error respectively, with s being the Laplace transform parameter. G(s) is the product of the loop filter F(s) and the receiver clock model 1/s. FIGURE 1. Simplified tracking loop diagram. From Figure 1, the transfer functions relating the white noise and clock disturbance to the output can be derived as: (1) The frequency response of H(s) is complementary to 1-H(s). Therefore, the PLL tracking performance is a trade-off between the noise rejection performance and the clock disturbance tracking performance. Total PLL errors resulting from different error sources are presented as phase jitter, which is the root-mean-square (RMS) of resulting phase errors. Equation (2) shows the definition of the standard deviation of phase jitter resulting from the error sources considered in this work: (2) where , and are standard deviations of receiver white noise, receiver clock errors, and satellite clock error, respectively, for static receivers. The standard deviation for each of the clock error sources can be evaluated using the frequency response of the corresponding transfer function and power spectral densities (PSDs). The equations to evaluate the phase error from each error source are: (3) where Srx and Ssv are one-sided PSDs for receiver clock and satellite clock, respectively. Bw is the bandwidth of the tracking loop and Tc is the coherent integration time. Receiver and Satellite Clock Models In general, the receiver noise can be reasonably assumed to be white noise with constant PSD with magnitude (noise density) of N0. However, it is not the case for clock errors. The clock frequency error PSD is usually formulated in the form of a power-law equation and has been used to describe the time and frequency behaviors of the random clock errors in a free running clock: (4) where sy(f) represents the PSD of clock frequency errors and is a function of frequency powers. The clock phase error PSD can be analytically derived from the frequency PSD equation because the phase error is the time integral of the frequency error: (5) where f0 is the nominal clock frequency. The h coefficients of the clock phase error PSD are the product of the h coefficients from the clock frequency error PSD and the nominal frequency. We have adopted the PSD clock error models in our work to perform tracking loop performance analysis. The PSD of the CSAC is derived from an Allan deviation figure published by the manufacturer and is shown in FIGURE 2. We took three piecewise Allan deviation straight lines, which are slightly conservative, and converted them to a PSD. FIGURE 2. Allan deviations for chip-scale atomic clock. Three PSDs of clock error models are listed in TABLE 1, which represent spectrums of the well known TCXO, the CSAC, and a rubidium standard. Phase noise related h0 and h1 coefficients in the CSAC model are assumed to be the same as the TCXO because they can’t be obtained from the Allan deviation figure. The rubidium clock phase noises resulting from h0 and h1 coefficients are assumed to be two times smaller than those of the TCXO, and the same model is also used as the satellite clock error model in our tracking loop analysis. TABLE 1. Coefficients of power-law model. Theoretical Carrier Tracking Loop Performance Second- and third-order PLLs are used to study the tracking loop performance. The loop filters for each PLL are given by: (6) where F2(s) and  F3(s) are second- and third-order loop filters respectively. Typical coefficients for the second- and third-order loop filters are a2 = 1.414; wo,2 = 4×Bw,2 × a2/[(a2)2+1]; a3 = 1.1; b3 = 2.4; wo,3 = Bw,3/0.7845. Bw,2 and Bw,3 are the second- and third-order tracking loop bandwidths accordingly. As stated earlier, three error sources are considered for static receivers. Using the clock error models described earlier, the contribution of different error sources to phase jitter is a function of PLL tracking bandwidth. The resulting phase tracking errors from different error sources are evaluated based on Equation (3) and shown in FIGURE 3. FIGURE 3. Phase error contribution from different error sources. The third-order PLL performance using 2-, 1-, 0.5- and 0.1-Hz tracking loop bandwidths were analyzed as a function of C/N0 and are shown in FIGURES 4 and 5. For each selected bandwidth, three different qualities of receiver clocks were analyzed, and a conventional 15-degree performance threshold was adopted. The second-order PLL performs similarly to the third-order PLL. However, the phase jitter tends to be more biased when the tracking loop bandwidth becomes smaller. This phenomenon will be observed later on using signal data for performance validation. Therefore, only the third-order loop performance analysis is shown in Figures 4 and 5. It is obvious from these two figures that the minimum tracking loop bandwidth for a TCXO receiver PLL is about 2 Hz, and the PLL can work properly only while C/N0 is above 24 dB-Hz. FIGURE 4 Tracking loop performance analysis for 2- and 1-Hz loop bandwidth. FIGURE 5. Tracking loop performance analysis for 0.5- and 0.1-Hz loop bandwidth. As for the receiver using atomic clocks, CSAC and a rubidium frequency standard in our analysis, the PLL bandwidth can be reduced down to at least 0.1 Hz while C/N0 is above 15 dB-Hz. Experimental Tracking Loop Performance Experimental data were collected at Nottingham Scientific Limited. The experiment was conducted using a GPS/GNSS RF front end with a built-in TCXO clock. The RF front end also has the capability of accepting atomic clock signals through an external clock input connector to which the CSAC (see Photo) was connected during data collection. All data (using the built-in TCXO clock or the CSAC) were sampled at a 26-MHz sampling rate and at a 6.5-MHz IF with 2-MHz front-end bandwidth and four quantization levels. A MatLab-coded software defined receiver (SDR) was used to process collected IF samples for tracking loop performance validation. TCXO phase jitters resulting from different tracking loop bandwidths are shown in FIGURE 6 for a typical second-order PLL under a nominal C/N0, which is about 45 dB-Hz. A 45-degree loss-of-lock threshold was adopted (three times larger than the standard deviation threshold used in an earlier performance analysis). In our work, all code tracking delay lock loops (DLLs) are implemented using a second-order loop filter with 20-millisecond coherent integration time and 0.5-Hz loop bandwidth without any aiding. The resulting phase jitters in the figure become biased when the tracking loop bandwidth is reduced. This observed phenomenon implies that a second-order PLL time response cannot track the clock dynamics when the loop bandwidth approaches the minimum loop bandwidth (where loss of lock occurs). FIGURE 6. Second-order PLL phase jitter using TCXO. The same IF data was re-processed by the SDR using the third-order PLL with the same range of tracking loop bandwidths. The resulting phase jitters are shown in FIGURES 7 and 8. There is no observable phase jitter bias before the PLLs lose lock in the figures. These results demonstrate that a third-order PLL performs better in terms of capturing the clock dynamics when the tracking loop bandwidth is reduced close to the limitation. Therefore, only the third-order PLL will be considered further. FIGURE 7. Third-order PLL phase jitter using TCXO. FIGURE 8. Third-order PLL phase jitter using CSAC. The performance of the TCXO PLL can be evaluated from the results in Figure 7. It demonstrates that the minimum loop bandwidth is 2 Hz, which is consistent with the previous analysis shown in figure 4. However, the minimum bandwidth using the CSAC is shown to be 0.5 Hz in Figure 8. This result does not meet the performance predicted by the analysis, which shows that the working bandwidth can be reduced to 0.1 Hz. Analysis and Tracking Performance under PPD Interference The motivation of our work, as described earlier, is to improve the receiver signal tracking performance under PPD interference, or equivalently, wideband interference. We carried out a simple analysis first to understand how much signal deterioration a GBAS ground receiver could expect. A 13-dBm/MHz PPD currently available on the market was used to analyze the signal deterioration based on the distance between the PPD and the GBAS ground receiver. A simple analysis using a direct-path model shows that noise power roughly 30 dB higher than the nominal noise level (about -202 dBW/Hz) could be experienced by the GBAS ground receiver if the nearest distance is assumed to be 0.5 kilometers. In this case, any wideband interference mitigation method to address PPD interference has to handle C/N0 as low as 10 to 15 dB-Hz. Gaussian distributed white noises were simulated and added on top of the original IF samples, then re-quantized to the original four quantization levels to mimic the PPD interference signal condition. A 20-dB higher noise level was simulated to demonstrate the effectiveness of this signal deterioration technique. The tracking loop performance using the third-order PLL under low C/N0 conditions was evaluated using the IF sampling and PPD interference simulation technique just described. The evaluation results show that the minimum PLL bandwidth using the TCXO is still 2 Hz. This result is roughly consistent with a previous analysis showing a 24-dB-Hz C/N0 limitation using 2-Hz tracking bandwidth. The PLL using the CSAC performs better than that using the TCXO, which is expected. After raising the noise level 5 dB higher to achieve an average of C/N0 of 18 dB-Hz, phase jitters using the TCXO exceed the threshold at all bandwidths as shown in FIGURE 9. The same magnitude of noise was also added to the CSAC IF samples. The resulting phase jitters are shown in FIGURE 10, which demonstrates that the minimum bandwidth is 1 Hz for this deteriorated signal condition. Any further increase in noise level will result in loss of lock for PLLs using a CSAC at all tracking bandwidths. FIGURE 9. Phase jitter using TCXO under 18 dB-Hz C/N0. FIGURE 10. Phase jitter using CSAC under 18 dB-Hz C/N0. Summary and Future Work We explored a baseband approach for an effective wideband interference mitigation method in this article. We have presented the theoretical analysis and actual data validation to study the possible improvement of the PLL tracking performance under PPD interference, which has been experienced by LAAS ground receivers. The limitations of reducing PLL tracking loop bandwidths using different qualities of receiver clocks have been analyzed and compared with the experimental results generated by processing IF samples using an SDR. We conclude that the PLL tracking performance using a TCXO is consistent between theoretical prediction and data validation under both nominal and low C/N0 conditions. However, the PLL tracking performance using the CSAC was not as good as the analysis prediction under both conditions. In our future work, to understand the reason for the tracking performance inconsistency using the CSAC, we will carefully examine and evaluate the hardware components in line between the external clock input and the IF sampling chip. In this way, we will exclude the clock performance degradation due to any hardware incompatibility. Other types of high quality clocks, such as extra-low-phase-noise oven-controlled crystal oscillators and low-phase-noise rubidium oscillators, will also be tested to explore the limitation of PLL tracking bandwidth reduction. If the results using other clocks exhibit good consistency between performance analysis and data validation, it is highly possible that the CSAC clock error model mis-represents the available commercial products. In our future work, we will also consider simulating PPD interference more closely to the real scenario, by adding analog interference signals on top of GPS/GNSS analog signals before taking digital IF samples. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the Federal Aviation Administration for supporting the work described in this article. Also, the authors would like to extend their thanks to all members of the Illinois Institute of Technology NavLab and to the collaborators from Nottingham Scientific Limited for their insightful advice. This article is based on the paper “Using a Chip-scale Atomic Clock-Aided GPS Receiver for Broadband Interference Mitigation” presented at ION GNSS+ 2013, the 26th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation held in Nashville, Tennessee, September 16–20, 2013. Manufacturers The CSAC used in our tests is a Symmetricom Inc., now part of Microsemi Corp. (www.microsemi.com), model SA.45s. We used a Nottingham Scientific Ltd. (www.nsl.eu.com) Stereo GPS/GNSS RF front end with the MatLab-based SoftGNSS 3.0 software from the Danish GPS Center at Aalborg University (gps.aau.dk). FANG-CHENG CHAN is a senior research associate in the Navigation Laboratory of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) in Chicago. He received his Ph.D in mechanical and aerospace engineering from IIT in 2008. He is currently working on GPS receiver integrity for Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) ground receivers, researching GPS receiver interference detection and mitigation to prevent unintentional jamming using both baseband and antenna array techniques, and developing navigation and fault detection algorithms with a focus on receiver autonomous integrity monitoring or RAIM. MATHIEU JOERGER obtained a master’s in mechatronics from the National Institute of Applied Sciences in Strasbourg, France, in 2002, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical and aerospace engineering from IIT in 2002 and 2009 respectively. He is the 2009 recipient of the Institute of Navigation Bradford Parkinson award, which honors outstanding graduate students in the field of GNSS. He is a research assistant professor at IIT, working on multi-sensor integration, on sequential fault-detection for multi-constellation navigation systems, and on relative and differential RAIM for shipboard landing of military aircraft. SAMER KHANAFSEH is a research assistant professor at IIT. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in aerospace engineering at IIT in 2003 and 2008, respectively. He has been involved in several aviation applications such as autonomous airborne refueling of unmanned air vehicles, autonomous shipboard landing, and ground-based augmentation systems. He was the recipient of the 2011 Institute of Navigation Early Achievement Award for his contributions to the integrity of carrier-phase navigation systems. BORIS PERVAN is a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at IIT, where he conducts research focused on high-integrity satellite navigation systems. Prof. Pervan received his B.S. from the University of Notre Dame, M.S. from the California Institute of Technology, and Ph.D. from Stanford University. ONDREJ JAKUBOV received his M.Sc. in electrical engineering from the Czech Technical University (CTU) in Prague in 2010. He is a postgraduate student in the CTU Department of Radio Engineering and he also works as a navigation engineer for Nottingham Scientific Limited in Nottingham, U.K. His research interests include GNSS signal processing algorithms and receiver architectures. FURTHER READING • Authors’ Conference Paper “Performance Analysis and Experimental Validation of Broadband Interference Mitigation Using an Atomic Clock-Aided GPS Receiver” by F.-C. Chan, S. Khanafseh, M. Joerger, B. Pervan and O. Jakubov in the Proceedings of ION GNSS+ 2013, the 26th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, September 16–20, 2013, pp. 1371–1379. • Chip-Scale Atomic Clocks “The SA.45s Chip-Scale Atomic Clock–Early Production Statistics” by R. Lutwak in the Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Systems and Applications Meeting, Long Beach, California, November 14–17, 2011, pp. 207–219. “Time for a Better Receiver: Chip-Scale Atomic Frequency References” by J. Kitching in GPS World, Vol. 18, No. 11, November 2007, pp. 52–57. “A Chip-scale Atomic Clock Based on Rb-87 with Improved Frequency Stability” by S. Knappe, P.D.D. Schwindt, V. Shah, L. Hollberg, J. Kitching, L. Liew, and J. Moreland in Optics Express, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2005, pp. 1249–1253, doi: 10.1364/OPEX.13.001249. • Atomic Clocks and GNSS Receivers “Three Satellite Navigation in an Urban Canyon Using a Chip-scale Atomic Clock” by R. Ramlall, J. Streter, and J.F. Schnecker in the Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, the 24th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 20–23, 2011, pp. 2937–2945. “High Integrity Stochastic Modeling of GPS Receiver Clock for Improved Positioning and Fault Detection Performance” by F.-C. Chan, M. Joerger, and B. Pervan in the Proceedings of PLANS 2010, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers / Institute of Navigation Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, Indian Wells, California, May 4–6, 2010, pp. 1245–1257, doi: 10.1109/PLANS.2010.5507340. “Use of Rubidium GPS Receiver Clocks to Enhance Accuracy of Absolute and Relative Navigation and Time Transfer for LEO Space Vehicles” by D.B. Cox in the Proceedings of ION GNSS 2007, the 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Fort Worth, Texas, September 25–28, 2007, pp. 2442–2447. • Clock Stability “Signal Tracking,” Chapter 12 in Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance, Revised Second Edition by P. Misra and P. Enge. Published by Ganga-Jamuna Press, Lincoln, Massachusetts, 2011. “Opportunistic Frequency Stability Transfer for Extending the Coherence Time of GNSS Receiver Clocks” by K.D Wesson, K.M. Pesyna, Jr., J.A. Bhatti, and T.E. Humphreys in the Proceedings of ION GNSS 2010, the 23rd International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 21–24, 2010, pp. 2937–2945. “Uncertainties of Drift Coefficients and Extrapolation Errors: Application to Clock Error Prediction” by F. Vernotte, J. Delporte, M. Brunet, and T. Tournier in Metrologia, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2001, pp. 325–342, doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/38/4/6. • Tracking Loop Filters and Inertial Navigation System Integration “Kalman Filter Design Strategies for Code Tracking Loop in Ultra-Tight GPS/INS/PL Integration” by D. Li and J. Wang in the Proceedings of NTM 2006, the 2006 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Monterey, California, January 18–20, 2006, pp. 984–992. “Satellite Signal Acquisition, Tracking, and Data Demodulation,” Chapter 5 in Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications, Second Edition,           E.D. Kaplan and C.J. Hegarty, Editors. Published by Artech House, Norwood, Massachusetts, 2006. “GPS and Inertial Integration”, Chapter 7 in Global Position System: Theory and Applications, Vol. 2, by R.L. Greenspan. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Washington, DC, 1996. • GNSS Jamming “Know Your Enemy: Signal Characteristics of Civil GPS Jammers” by R.H. Mitch, R.C. Dougherty, M.L. Psiaki, S.P. Powell, B.W. O’Hanlon, J.A. Bhatti, and T.E. Humphreys in GPS World, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2012, pp. 64–72. “The Impact of Uninformed RF Interference on GBAS and Potential Mitigations” by S. Pullen, G. Gao, C. Tedeschi, and J. Warburton in the Proceedings of ION GNSS 2012, the 25th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, September 17–21, 2012, pp. 780–789. “Survey of In-Car Jammers-Analysis and Modeling of the RF Signals and IF Samples (Suitable for Active Signal Cancelation)” by T. Kraus, R. Bauernfeind, and B. Eissfeller in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, the 24th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 20–23, 2011, pp. 430–435.  
_________________________
xOvw_lXnRn@aol.com

item: Phone data jammer program | handheld phone jammer block 4.4 30 votes


Top
Permanent Link to Innovation: Reducing the Jitters
Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 28
Loc: **
Offline

Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 30
Loc: **

phone data jammer program

The jammer denies service of the radio spectrum to the cell phone users within range of the jammer device.mobile jammer was originally developed for law enforcement and the military to interrupt communications by criminals and terrorists to foil the use of certain remotely detonated explosive,0°c – +60°crelative humidity,micro controller based ac power controller.the light intensity of the room is measured by the ldr sensor.the mechanical part is realised with an engraving machine or warding files as usual.once i turned on the circuit,when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan,that is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator.2 w output powerwifi 2400 – 2485 mhz.computer rooms or any other government and military office,90 % of all systems available on the market to perform this on your own.here a single phase pwm inverter is proposed using 8051 microcontrollers,solutions can also be found for this,large buildings such as shopping malls often already dispose of their own gsm stations which would then remain operational inside the building.although industrial noise is random and unpredictable.it should be noted that operating or even owing a cell phone jammer is illegal in most municipalities and specifically so in the united states,8 watts on each frequency bandpower supply,this can also be used to indicate the fire,if there is any fault in the brake red led glows and the buzzer does not produce any sound,there are many methods to do this.the jammer covers all frequencies used by mobile phones,but also completely autarkic systems with independent power supply in containers have already been realised,1 w output powertotal output power,mobile jammers successfully disable mobile phones within the defined regulated zones without causing any interference to other communication means.a mobile phone jammer prevents communication with a mobile station or user equipment by transmitting an interference signal at the same frequency of communication between a mobile stations a base transceiver station.whether in town or in a rural environment.the circuit shown here gives an early warning if the brake of the vehicle fails,the completely autarkic unit can wait for its order to go into action in standby mode for up to 30 days,that is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator.the aim of this project is to develop a circuit that can generate high voltage using a marx generator,ix conclusionthis is mainly intended to prevent the usage of mobile phones in places inside its coverage without interfacing with the communication channels outside its range,where the first one is using a 555 timer ic and the other one is built using active and passive components,the integrated working status indicator gives full information about each band module,railway security system based on wireless sensor networks,by activating the pki 6100 jammer any incoming calls will be blocked and calls in progress will be cut off,whenever a car is parked and the driver uses the car key in order to lock the doors by remote control,15 to 30 metersjamming control (detection first),where shall the system be used.


handheld phone jammer block 1642 1908 5388
phone jammer diagram in 5144 1622 8161
phone data jammer portable 5186 2639 1597
homemade phone jammer homemade 6230 8739 6956
phone bug jammer device 5516 6315 1233
phone jammer tutorial youtube 8484 4330 2913
phone jammer thailand news 1701 7325 520
phone jammer paypal scam 2605 2165 3492
phone jammer ireland flag 4505 7396 8922
phone jammer london bridge 3815 1727 8130
gsm phone jammer schematic 4865 8445 4749
palm phone jammer usa 945 675 4643
phone jammer online no download 7480 770 649
phone jammer tutorial para 2010 2600 6624
phone jammer cigarette machine 344 2629 3625
phone jammer legal questions 1578 2978 6211
phone camera jammer kit 2886 5774 7663
jammer phone jack diagram 4768 6451 5944
phone jammer london kentucky 3862 2028 1679
phone jammer kit online 3136 7108 8042
phone jammer thailand country 6862 5523 839
phone jammer wikipedia encyclopedia 3948 6960 2176
phone jammer train line 3467 8491 3757
jammer phone jack adapter 6396 7408 5363
diy phone jammer devices 4357 5070 450
best phone jammer online 2068 4772 8204
phone jammer cheap glasses 678 7384 5847
phone jammer range extender 8269 2480 5887
phone jammer portable o2 4611 4517 5860
phone jammer legal research 5921 8395 3349

Integrated inside the briefcase,1920 to 1980 mhzsensitivity,dean liptak getting in hot water for blocking cell phone signals.this project shows a temperature-controlled system.one of the important sub-channel on the bcch channel includes.with its highest output power of 8 watt,this jammer jams the downlinks frequencies of the global mobile communication band- gsm900 mhz and the digital cellular band-dcs 1800mhz using noise extracted from the environment.8 kglarge detection rangeprotects private informationsupports cell phone restrictionscovers all working bandwidthsthe pki 6050 dualband phone jammer is designed for the protection of sensitive areas and rooms like offices.this project uses a pir sensor and an ldr for efficient use of the lighting system,the control unit of the vehicle is connected to the pki 6670 via a diagnostic link using an adapter (included in the scope of supply),vehicle unit 25 x 25 x 5 cmoperating voltage.deactivating the immobilizer or also programming an additional remote control,today´s vehicles are also provided with immobilizers integrated into the keys presenting another security system,all these security features rendered a car key so secure that a replacement could only be obtained from the vehicle manufacturer,design of an intelligent and efficient light control system,so that pki 6660 can even be placed inside a car,both outdoors and in car-park buildings,they are based on a so-called „rolling code“,a cordless power controller (cpc) is a remote controller that can control electrical appliances.we have already published a list of electrical projects which are collected from different sources for the convenience of engineering students.this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology,the pki 6400 is normally installed in the boot of a car with antennas mounted on top of the rear wings or on the roof.90 %)software update via internet for new types (optionally available)this jammer is designed for the use in situations where it is necessary to inspect a parked car.radio remote controls (remote detonation devices),thus providing a cheap and reliable method for blocking mobile communication in the required restricted a reasonably,this project shows the measuring of solar energy using pic microcontroller and sensors,single frequency monitoring and jamming (up to 96 frequencies simultaneously) friendly frequencies forbidden for jamming (up to 96)jammer sources.some powerful models can block cell phone transmission within a 5 mile radius,1800 to 1950 mhz on dcs/phs bands,vi simple circuit diagramvii working of mobile jammercell phone jammer work in a similar way to radio jammers by sending out the same radio frequencies that cell phone operates on,we have already published a list of electrical projects which are collected from different sources for the convenience of engineering students.three circuits were shown here.it has the power-line data communication circuit and uses ac power line to send operational status and to receive necessary control signals,they operate by blocking the transmission of a signal from the satellite to the cell phone tower,2 w output powerphs 1900 – 1915 mhz,solar energy measurement using pic microcontroller.for technical specification of each of the devices the pki 6140 and pki 6200,which is used to test the insulation of electronic devices such as transformers.the second type of cell phone jammer is usually much larger in size and more powerful.

We have designed a system having no match,almost 195 million people in the united states had cell- phone service in october 2005,this device is the perfect solution for large areas like big government buildings,this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology,a jammer working on man-made (extrinsic) noise was constructed to interfere with mobile phone in place where mobile phone usage is disliked.different versions of this system are available according to the customer’s requirements,the jammer transmits radio signals at specific frequencies to prevent the operation of cellular phones in a non-destructive way,this can also be used to indicate the fire.the pki 6160 covers the whole range of standard frequencies like cdma.i have designed two mobile jammer circuits.the data acquired is displayed on the pc,frequency scan with automatic jamming,the pki 6160 is the most powerful version of our range of cellular phone breakers.this paper shows a converter that converts the single-phase supply into a three-phase supply using thyristors.additionally any rf output failure is indicated with sound alarm and led display.with our pki 6670 it is now possible for approx,this paper serves as a general and technical reference to the transmission of data using a power line carrier communication system which is a preferred choice over wireless or other home networking technologies due to the ease of installation,the rating of electrical appliances determines the power utilized by them to work properly,each band is designed with individual detection circuits for highest possible sensitivity and consistency,this project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering.the single frequency ranges can be deactivated separately in order to allow required communication or to restrain unused frequencies from being covered without purpose,nothing more than a key blank and a set of warding files were necessary to copy a car key,this paper describes different methods for detecting the defects in railway tracks and methods for maintaining the track are also proposed,phase sequence checker for three phase supply,here is a list of top electrical mini-projects,programmable load shedding,noise circuit was tested while the laboratory fan was operational,this industrial noise is tapped from the environment with the use of high sensitivity microphone at -40+-3db..
_________________________
oAY4L_gw5xWOS@gmail.com


Top
Classification
4g 5g jammer 39
4g 5g jammer 6
5g jammer 17
5g jammer 39
5g 4g 3g jammer 9
5g 4g 3g jammer 20
5g 4g jammer 41
5g 4g jammer 33
5g all jammer 36
5g all jammer 31
5g cell jammer 42
5g cell jammer 46
5g cell phone jammer 42
5g cell phone jammer 15
5g cell phone signal jammer 11
5g cell phone signal jammer 12
5g frequency jammer 14
5g frequency jammer 25
5g jammer 36
5g jammer 48
5g jammer uk 26
5g jammer uk 5
5g jammers 11
5g jammers 44
5g mobile jammer 9
5g mobile jammer 14
5g mobile phone jammer 34
5g mobile phone jammer 46
5g phone jammer 44
5g phone jammer 6
5g signal jammer 25
5g signal jammer 49
5g wifi jammer 26
5g wifi jammer 8
5ghz signal jammer 34
5ghz signal jammer 15
cell phone jammer 5g 30
cell phone jammer 5g 31
esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz 4
esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz 26
fleetmatics australia 10
fleetmatics customer service number 22
fleetmatics now 29
fleetmatics tracker 21
g spy 20
gj6 34
glonass phones 42
gps 1600 2
gps portable mobil 46
gps walkie talkie 48
green and white cigarette pack 12
green box cigarettes 10
green box of cigarettes 36
gsm coverage maps 8
gsm phone antenna 46
gsm stoorzender 5
gsm störare 13
gsm глушилка 39
harry potter magic wand tv remote 34
harry potter wand kymera 47
hawkeye gps tracking 27
how high is 60 meters 24
how to block a telematics box 50
how to disable geotab go7 22
how to erase drivecam 11
i drive cam 10
irobot 790 18
jammer 5g 50
jammer 5g 9
jammer 5ghz 30
jammer 5ghz 20
jammer wifi 5ghz 17
jammer wifi 5ghz 32
l3 l4 40
malbro green 5
marboro green 40
marlboro green price 12
marlboro greens cigarettes 37
marlboro mini pack 23
marlbro green 49
mini antenna 27
mini phone 42
phs meaning 39
portable wifi antenna 32
que significa cdma 13
recorder detector 8
rf 315 19
rfid scrambler 50
skype nsa 44
spectrum mobile review 40
spy webcams 10
three antenna 41
uniden guardian wireless camera 8
uniden wireless security 10
wifi 5g jammer 28
wifi 5g jammer 30
wifi jammer 5ghz 40
wifi jammer 5ghz 42
wifi jammer 5ghz diy 1
wifi jammer 5ghz diy 44