Phone jammer 8 grammy | phone jammer ireland football

Permanent Link to Innovation: Mobile-phone GPS antennas
Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 40
Loc: **
Offline

Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 46
Loc: **
Can They Be Better? By Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier We examine the antenna designs that provide GPS functionality to mobile phones and why most phones still do not provide GPS operation indoors. We also see what it will take to make them better. INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley WHAT ARE THREE THINGS THAT MATTER MOST for a good GPS signal? Antenna, antenna, antenna. The familiar real-estate adage can be rephrased for this purpose, although the original — location, location, location — is valid here, too. GPS satellite signals are notoriously weak compared to familiar terrestrial signals such as those of broadcast stations or mobile-phone towers. However, if an appropriate antenna has a clear line-of-sight to the satellite, excellent receiver performance is the norm. But what constitutes an appropriate antenna? The GPS signals are right-hand circularly polarized (RHCP) to provide fade-free reception as the satellite’s orientation changes during a pass. A receiving antenna with matching polarization will transfer the most signal power to the receiver. Microstrip patch antennas and quadrifilar helices, two RHCP antennas commonly used for GPS reception, have omnidirectional (in azimuth) gain patterns with typical unamplified boresight gains of a few dB greater than that of an ideal isotropic RHCP antenna. But what happens when signals are obstructed by trees or buildings or, worse yet, when we move indoors? Received signal strength plummets. A conventional receiver, even with a good antenna, will then have difficulty acquiring and tracking the signals, resulting in missed or even no position fixes. However, thanks in large part to massive parallel correlation, receivers have been developed with 1,000 times more sensitivity than conventional receivers, permitting operation in restricted environments, albeit usually with reduced positioning accuracy. But such operation requires a standard antenna. So, do the GPS receivers in our mobile phones now work everywhere? Sadly, no. Consumers demand that their phones not only provide voice communications and GPS but also Bluetooth connectivity to headsets, Wi-Fi, and even an FM transmitter, all in a small form factor at reasonable cost. This requires miniaturizing the GPS antenna and possibly integrating it with the other radio services on the platform. Such compromises can, if the designer is not careful, significantly reduce receiver effectiveness with dramatically reduced antenna gain and distorted antenna patterns. This month we look at some antenna designs providing GPS functionality to mobile phones and examine why most phones still do not provide GPS operation indoors or in other challenging environments. We also find out what it will take to make them better. “Innovation” is a regular column that features discussions about recent advances in GPS technology and its applications as well as the fundamentals of GPS positioning. The column is coordinated by Richard Langley of the Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering at the University of New Brunswick, who welcomes your comments and topic ideas. GPS is becoming a must-have feature in mobile phones, with major manufacturers launching new designs regularly, and second-tier manufacturers rapidly catching up. A quick test of any early GPS-equipped phone shows that although the incumbent GPS chip (or chipset) has high sensitivity, the integrated end result cannot perform in low signal conditions. Several challenges facing the phone designer are responsible for this, with the main two being the antenna performance and interference in the GPS band generated within the phone platform itself. Here we explore the antenna’s role in determining overall performance of the GPS function in a mobile phone, and the potential for avoiding some platform jamming signals by choice of antenna technology.We present some results from an ongoing company study, as part of our remit to assist customers at the system integration level in support of GPS chip sales. Many handset makers are not GPS or even RF experts, and rely on catalog components to provide their GPS and antenna hardware. Often unsuitable antennas are chosen, or the antennas are integrated in such a way that the original operation mode does not work. Study of a number of candidate phones has shown that, due to the small ground plane available, the antenna component may be merely a band-tuning device, with the ground plane contributing the signal collection function. At the beginning of 2008, our team launched a project to understand and prioritize the problems for handset makers in the antenna area, and to provide better solutions than those currently in use. The handset designer faces several problems when incorporating a GPS antenna. First, it has to be very low cost (a few cents, probably). Secondly, it has to be broadly omnidirectional, since there is no knowledge of “up” on a mobile phone, although some manufacturers rely on the fact that location will only be needed when the phone is in the user’s hand or an in-car holder. From the GPS receiver point of view, we would like the antenna to be as far from the communications (transmitting) antenna as possible, and also removed from other transmitting services such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and FM. Users must not be able to detune the antenna out of band by placing their hands on the phone, or by raising the phone to their ears. In a perfect world, they would not obscure an antenna either. Of course, we would also like to remove some of that platform interference at the antenna stage, and techniques such as differential RF inputs (with a differential antenna) have been proposed in the search for better noise-cancellation performance. All of this leaves the handset designer with an impossible task, since he has run out of space to fit a decent GPS antenna with all the isolation requirements, and we typically measure GPS antennas that average 26 to 215 dB of gain with respect to a reference dipole, which measures around 21 dB compared to an isotropic antenna when integrated in the handset. Given that a 2 dB loss equates to double the time to fix (in low signal environments) or, alternately, double the amount of baseband signal-search hardware in the GPS chip, it follows that we must exert some effort to help handset integrators implement better antennas. In this respect, some larger manufacturers have in-house projects running, but smaller ones do not have antenna design teams and rely on their suppliers to provide solutions. So, we start with cataloging the requirements, and given that most current implementations are only in the “mediocre to terrible” class, we look at ways of improving things accordingly. Of course, there are good GPS antenna solutions out there, but handset designers have mostly shunned them on the grounds of cost or even size. Restrictions on these parameters severely hamper the antenna designer, as reducing a GPS L1 antenna below its “natural” size  — about 4 centimeters for a monopole on commonly used FR4-type printed circuit board (PCB) material — inevitably means either using some higher dielectric material, which adds cost, or folding the structure up, which decreases performance. Single-ended antennas, such as monopoles and microstrip patches, rely on a ground plane, which in a handset is undersized anyway, and is usually difficult to identify and model. True differential designs (such as a dipole) overcome this problem, but are automatically larger. As handsets get smaller and encompass more “connectivity” (that is, more radio links, including GPS) and competition for antenna space increases, combined antennas become attractive, as they would at least help with the size issue. However, the isolation problems are increased, and since our various radios all (currently) need individual RF inputs, some new layer of complexity and filtering is needed between antenna and chip. Theory, Performance. We undertook some practical experiments to get a feel for the gap between an antenna’s theoretical performance and its installed performance when integrated with the other phone functions. At present, the idea of modeling all the radiation interactions and mechanical arrangements within such a platform is beyond the scope of the available tools, and so practical measurements are really our only choice in the quest for better antennas. Finally, we provide some insight into the future, given the rapid advancements driven by mobile-phone technology and the advent of the low-cost handset for new emerging markets. New challenges loom ahead for GNSS antennas, not the least being more bandwidth and multiple frequencies, and we look briefly at what must be done to keep up with handset manufacturers’ requirements in this regard. Size of the Problem Location-based services in mobile phones is now an expected function by the more discerning user. With more than 500 million users of such services expected by 2011, pressure on manufacturers to provide ever better user experiences and competition between phone manufacturers will bring pressure on the GPS industry for improved performance. GNSS is now the location technology of choice for mobile phones and will remain so provided that the industry can maintain leadership in cost, size, and performance. FIGURE 1 shows the expected penetration of GNSS (mostly just GPS) in the next few years. Figure 1. GNSS penetration, mobile phones (Image: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) With this many users, the market will soon decide whether the performance is up to expectation or not; this in itself will determine GPS penetration going forward. Vanishing Space. The first challenge facing the RF antenna designer working on a mobile phone is the size of the whole platform. As the size of the average phone continues to fall, manufacturers are understandably reluctant to increase size again to add new features, such as GPS. Consider the wavelengths of a phone’s various RF services. If the corresponding antennas were implemented as dipoles, the antennas would be bigger than the phone. Clearly the competition for antenna space is high. The designer will want to separate the antennas as much as possible to reduce coupling between them, both in the sense of coupling interference from one service to another (known as isolation) and in the sense of spoiling the pattern (or field) of one antenna with another (interaction). The chip business addresses the space issue through the advent of combination or combo chips, containing such peripheral services as FM (both receive and transmit), Bluetooth, GPS, and Wi-Fi. While helping with space constraints, this development brings new challenges as these radios have to cohabit the same silicon and still perform individually, whatever the other radios are doing (transmitting music to the car radio using FM while navigating with GPS, for example). It follows that combo antennas similarly save space, but since this might involve simultaneous transmit and GPS receive functions, it is very difficult to achieve the necessary isolation, especially if the user’s body can change the coupling between functions. FIGURE 2 shows a modern phone with some antennas identified. Not shown is the FM transmit antenna on the rear (the receive function uses the headset cable). One commercially available combo antenna and two custom-made antennas are designed to fit the mechanical layout of the phone. The GPS antenna has been placed at the top of the phone, relegating the communications antenna (really another combo since it handles four frequency bands) to the bottom of the phone, where it is subject to detuning by the user’s hand. The GPS antenna is of the PIFA (planar inverted F antenna) type, working against the ground plane of the main PCB, and is printed on a plastic molding that also implements a loudspeaker and its electrical connections. Figure 2. Antennas in a mobile phone: 1. GSM/WCDMA antenna, 2.Wi-Fi/Bluetooth combined ceramic chip antenna, 3. GPS antenna (Image: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) Size. Until now, we have not looked at the size of GPS antennas. We know that a dipole (on FR4 PCB material) is about 8 centimeters in length, just a little shorter than the average phone platform. Changing to a monopole halves the natural length, but requires an “infinite” ground plane to work against. Ignoring this requirement, some manufacturers simply print a monopole on the main PCB, and put up with the coupling, losses, and pattern deficiencies that arise. Some while ago, we measured the gain of such an arrangement at about 212 dB relative to the reference dipole. So designers have turned to size-reduced antennas, either by using higher dielectric materials to form them, or by using complex shape and feed derivatives (such as the PIFA in Figure 2.) Another combo idea is to use the communications antenna. In the case shown in FIGURE 3, this is a whip-type antenna on a clamshell-type phone. Although the antenna is free for GPS and uses no additional space, the components to tune the whip for GPS and prevent the transmit bands reaching the GPS low noise amplifier (LNA) add both cost and size. So this is not really too attractive, especially when measurements show a 216 dB performance relative to our dipole, along with a poor coverage pattern. In this model, removing the whip and leaving the ferrule to which it connects provided a 6 dB improvement in performance (for GPS only; obviously it spoils the communications function). Figure 3. Whip antenna combination (Image: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) A more conventional approach is to fit an off-the-shelf GPS antenna. The problem here is that any component-type antenna will have been tested with some standardized ground plane, and most are reliant on the ground plane for both tuning, and pattern and gain. A truly balanced design avoids this problem; FIGURE 4 shows an example. Although these antennas have found favor in personal navigation devices for their superior performance, they are not usually considered for mobile phones because of cost and size considerations. This antenna did, however, give us a reference device against which we could make comparative measurements when undertaking the practical test campaign. Figure 4. Sarantel miniature volute antenna (Image: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) A more usual selection is the patch type, long standard in the GPS industry. One such installation is shown in FIGURES 5 and 6, which offer two views of the same stripped-down phone. The main drawback of this arrangement is the lack of a ground plane visible to the patch antenna, giving both tuning and gain/pattern problems. We measured the gain of this antenna at about 28 dB compared to a dipole antenna connected to the same point in the circuit, which is actually at the better end of the performance range that we see. The designers gave the antenna a position at the top of the phone, as in the Figure 2 phone, but it is still squeezed for space onto the edge of the PCB in favor of the phone’s speakers and the camera components. In this phone, the communications antenna is again at the bottom of the PCB. Figure 5. Phone with GPS patch antenna at edge of PCB (Image: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) Figure 6. Edge view of GPS antenna, top of phone removed. This phone includes an external GPS antenna input connector seen here mounted below the patch antenna. (Image: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) Interference and Isolation. The related characteristics of interference and isolation are difficult to specify and model, leading to practical measurements as the only way of accurately characterizing them. Of course, since the mechanical arrangement (including plastics, screen, battery, and PCB components) plays such a large part in determining the levels of interference and isolation, these tests can only be carried out once the phone is at the prototype stage, when major surgery to improve any particular aspect is not really an option. This also creates a problem when considering new approaches, as the result may not resemble the stand-alone tests, unless the antenna element chosen really has no significant interaction with the rest of the phone. Most interference we see in mobile phones gets into the GPS receiver at the antenna. Typically this is followed by an RF filter of some sort, which although it spoils the noise figure, does eliminate the out-of-band transmissions from the other radios on the platform. Usually we see a plethora of self-generated in-band signals that have entered the GPS receiver via the antenna. Although we can’t filter them out, we can reduce the coupling between antenna and source as much as possible. One effect seen in current offerings is that the GPS antenna may actually be much better at coupling to interferers than it is at extracting GPS signals from free space, thus making the problem worse. To get a view of the coupling between antennas, we tested a few available phone types to see what was the actual coupling in the antenna band of interest (see TABLE 1). Of course, one advantage of a poor antenna is that its coupling is likely to be less to adjacent antennas. Coupling is also seriously affected by the user holding the phone or the surface on which it is placed. Phones in a pocket seem to be more affected in this way. The table shows measurements with the phone assembled as completely as possible (we have to get connectivity at the antennas) but not being affected by a user or the phone’s environment. Table: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier   Requirements To develop requirements for a better antenna implementation, we need to consider the factors discussed above, and to develop numerical specifications against each. Given the variables involving user interaction, mechanical changes from model to model, use cases and the ever-increasing pressure on cost and size, this is far from straightforward. Our team has spent considerable time defining requirements, and a short synopsis is reported here. In addition to the coexistence requirements (see the next section), the antenna should fulfill the following criteria: Minimum cost. The antenna should be of low implementation cost, preferably printed and not requiring complex connectivity to the main PCB, or to require any setup and/or tuning in production; Low loss. The GPS industry is used to antennas delivering around 0–3 dB (isotropic) in an upper hemispheric direction. We believe this will not be attainable in a mobile phone, but we set the gain target at an aggressive -4 dB (isotropic); Detuning. The antenna must continue to perform to specification with any reasonable detuning environment (such as user handling, pocket, and metal surfaces); Mechanical arrangement. The antenna should be of minimum dimensions that can fit the phone mechanics. For example, long and thin may be acceptable along one side of the phone. Also placement near the GPS chip avoids lossy RF tracking; Gain pattern. Essentially omnidirectional, accepting that other parts of the phone may cause localized dips in the pattern. Coexistence and Cohabitation. Initially we aim to define the parameters affecting interaction with other services on the phone platform. By coexistence, we mean the ability to share a platform with the other radios and antennas and only be marginally affected by them, whatever they are doing (such as transmitting full power, low power, or idling, and with any frequency choice). This produces a straightforward immunity table (see TABLE 2) once we have determined the basic isolation between all of the elements. For the purposes of Table 2, we have chosen 15 dB as the minimum isolation value between any two antennas. Obviously there are similar tables for the other functions (GSM, 3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, FM) as well. Table: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier   A glance at Table 2 will tell the reader that the modern mobile phone implements a vast number of transmit and receive frequencies, modulation types, and standards. Of particular concern to the GPS designer is the advent of wideband CDMA signals, which can cause intermodulation products to appear in band at the intermediate frequency of the GPS receiver. Special receiver techniques are required in this case, but the antenna is unable to help except by being of naturally narrow bandwidth. Cohabitation is a newer concept that describes the isolation between functions of the same device. In this respect, we are investigating GPS antennas combined with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth services. This is a fairly natural development, since these functions are all add-ons to a conventional phone platform, and there is a space-saving advantage in the combination. Since Wi-Fi and Bluetooth share the same band at 2.4 GHz, they have arrangements internally that allow them to coexist or choose which service is to be used if a clash is inevitable. As a precursor to forming some specifications, our team measured a commercially available combined antenna, and TABLE 3 shows the isolation results. Table: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier   The table highlights the need to measure antennas on a representative PCB, since other coupling factors reduce the specified isolation by >6 dB compared to the manufacturer’s reference setup, where the part is the only component on the demonstration board. Real-Life Testing A number of tests were carried out on available solutions to gain some information and experience about current offerings and platforms. At one of our facilities, we have a GTEM (gigahertz transverse electromagnetic) cell, which was constructed in house and has been verified to be working properly (see FIGURE 7). A GTEM cell is an expanded transmission line within which a uniform electromagnetic field can be generated for determining antenna properties such as gain and bandwidth. The internal space at the septum (40 centimeters) is big enough to handle antenna sizes used by GPS. It has a small side door and some feedthroughs (coaxial) to the bottom plate. The RF foam absorbers used inside the GTEM work well at 1.5 GHz (the cell can work from 100 MHz to above 10 GHz). Figure 7. The GTEM cell and related test equipment (Photo: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) Differential vs. Single-Ended Antennas. The first test conducted concerned comparison of balanced and unbalanced antennas, the theory being that a balanced antenna would help with interference because it would be presented to the GPS receiver as a common mode signal (that is, balanced on the positive and negative inputs). The NXP GNS7560 single-chip GPS solution is configurable for single or differential input to the LNA, and was used to conduct the tests. The trial began with calibration of the test setup using the balanced antenna shown in Figure 4, against which we measured a printed dipole antenna and a monopole equivalent, arranged to incorporate a balun to make it of the same size as the dipole (see FIGURE 8). Once this calibration had been made, we sought to generate an interfering signal on the GPS receiver test board so that comparisons of interference rejection could be made. This was done in two different ways, in case the method of exciting the GPS board was subject to resonances or peculiar standing-wave modes. First, we injected an RF interferer into the power supply via the USB cable that was both powering the GPS board and the communications link to it. The jamming created in this manner was increased until a predetermined drop in GPS sensitivity was reached. A number of frequencies were tried and the results compared. In the second setup, we directly applied an RF signal across the ground plane of the GPS board, using a coaxial feed to excite the ground plane, and repeated the stages described above. Figure 8. Antennas used in the balanced vs. unbalanced antenna testing (Photo: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier) Results for both tests were within 2 dB of each other, and showed that the differential approach could reduce local jammer pickup by only 4–6 dB. This is probably due to the differential structure being of similar size to the test platform (chosen to be similar to a phone platform), and therefore not achieving true differential coupling to the on-board radiated jammer. With this marginal advantage, we concluded that the benefit was barely justified by the extra complexity and size involved in differential antennas. Note that this conclusion may be different for smaller (for example, high dielectric) differential antennas, although these are currently not available. We are resolved to revisit this possibility at a later date. Testing Some Commercial Parts. Having elected to continue in unbalanced-only mode, we tested some commercially available antenna components, which are all aimed at mobile phones and span a range of technologies. Each antenna was tested on its recommended reference design without other mobile phone components or features. However, we did use phone-sized boards, representative plastics, and a real user’s hand in these tests. TABLE 4 shows the comparative results. Table: Tony Haddrell, Marino Phocas, and Nico Ricquier   For return loss measurements we used a vector network analyzer and a ferrite absorber clamp to suppress cable common-mode effects. For measuring the antenna-received voltage, we used an open-air setup with a horn antenna placed 1 meter away from the DUT (device under test) antenna. The horn is fed with a 100 dBuV 1575 MHz CW signal and the received signal at the DUT is inspected with a spectrum analyzer. The horn is mounted so that we have vertical polarization. Initially, we were only concerned with looking for the maximum attainable voltage and we have positioned the DUT also to vertical polarization. Wooden tables were used to avoid reflections. The last two columns in Table 4 are with plastic in close proximity to the antenna element and the last column is with the plastic grabbed by the hand (as one would grab a phone). The first thing to note is that of the antennas reported above (which were the best of a bigger number of test pieces) the performance is roughly the same for all of them when configured in their reference mechanical arrangement and not interacting with the phone environment. From the table, we can see that for the particular antenna tested in two positions, its location on the ground plane defines its performance (the ceramic-loaded antenna lost 3 dB in voltage terms when moved to the shorter side of the board). This may be a problem in that the best position performance-wise is not the best for the case where the user interacts with the complete assembly. Also, we see that the user and the plastics have a big effect. In short, the component-type antennas currently available don’t show exciting performance in a real environment, but most are competent GPS antennas when integrated according to their makers’ instructions. However, this is often not possible due to mechanical and other constraints. One drawback of the monopole type of device is its need for a ground-plane-free area underneath the component, and this often conflicts with the requirements of the other antennas, which are looking to maximize the ground plane in the phone. Novel Approaches, Validation We started this program to identify the requirements of a good GPS antenna, test some theories and current components, and then develop a new approach. From the foregoing, it is clear that a design that is part of the phone mechanics itself will be better integrated and more predictable in the final implementation. Our design team has begun to model and test some more PCB-centric solutions that attempt to mimic at least the current performance of commercial components, and to minimize the amount of ground-plane loss. We do all our testing on representative (in size and conductivity) phone PCBs. A new approach to thinking about potential arrangements is to use the previously mentioned concept that the whole board is the radiator and the antenna is actually a tuning and feed device. One promising possibility is a slot antenna (or slot feed) formed by removing a small notch of ground plane along the top edge of the phone PCB. Some phones have demonstrated success in forming Bluetooth antennas in this manner, although the lower frequency of GPS does not help. On a separate path, another idea is to print a PIFA (or similar structure) on the plastics themselves and have it work against the phone ground plane in total. In this case, it is relatively easy to get good performance, but connection of the feed to the main board (where the GPS chipset will be located) is a non-trivial mechanical problem. Testing of some candidate solutions is under way, and we expect reference designs for customer use to be the deliverable from this work. In addition, it is clear that there is not a one-solution-fits-all conclusion, and that more work will be necessary as phone and GPS designs are further developed. Acknowledgments The authors thank the antenna engineering team at NXP’s Mobile and Personal Innovation Center, especially Tony Kerselaers, Felix Elsen, and Norbert Philips who conducted the trials reported here. This article is based on the paper “A New Approach to Cellphone GPS Antennas” presented at ION GNSS 2008. TONY HADDRELL is a fellow staff architect. ST-Ericsson in Daventry, England, and a director of iNS Ltd., Weedon, England. MARINO PHOCAS is an RF systems engineer with ST-Ericsson. NICO RICQUIER heads the Connectivity Group at NXP Semiconductors in Leuven, Belgium. Some Mobile Phone Terms Bluetooth (BT). A communications protocol operating in the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) frequency band, enabling electronic devices to connect and communicate in short-range ad hoc networks. CDMA. Code division multiple access is a channel access method used by some mobile-phone carriers that allows multiple users to share the same radio frequencies using spread spectrum signals. DCS1800. Digital Cellular Service version of GSM operating in the 1700 and 1800 MHz bands. EDGE. Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution, a third-generation (3G) version of GSM. EGSM900. The Extended GSM 900 MHz band. FDD. Frequency-division duplexing, a communications protocol that uses different carrier frequencies for transmitt ing and receiving. FM. The broadcast frequency modulation band. GMSK. Gaussian minimum shift keying, a continuous-phase frequency-shift keying modulation scheme used for GSM communications. GSM. Global System for Mobile communications, the most popular mobile phone standard. GSM850. A GSM version operating in the 800 MHz band. PCS1900. Personal Communications Service version of GSM operating in the 1800 and 1900 MHz bands. QPSK. Quadrature phase-shift keying. A modulation technique used in CDMA systems. Triplexer. A filtering device to provide isolation between communications and GPS circuits when sharing an antenna. W-CDMA. Wideband CDMA, an enhanced, 3G version of CDMA. Wi-Fi 802.11b/g. Wi-Fi describes a standard class of wireless local area network (WLAN) protocols based on the IEEE 802.11 standards operating primarily in the 2.4 GHz band. FURTHER READING • Mobile Phone Development “The Smartphone Revolution” by F. van Diggelen in GPS World, Vol. 20, No. 12, December 2009, pp. 36–40. • Signal Compatibility Issues “Jammers – the Enemy Inside!” by M. Phocas, J. Bickerstaff, and T. Haddrell in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2004, the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, California, September 21–24, 2004, pp. 156–165. • High Sensitivity GPS Receiver “A Single Die GPS, with Indoor Sensitivity – the NXP GNS7560” by T. Haddrell, J.P. Bickerstaff, and M. Conta in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2008, the 21st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, September 16–19, 2009, pp. 1201–1209. • Mobile Phone GPS Antennas “A Compact Broadband Planar Antenna for GPS, DCS-1800, IMT-2000, and WLAN Applications” by R. Li, B. Pan, J. Laskar, M.M. Tentzeris in IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 6, 2007, pp. 25–27 (doi:10.1109/LAWP.2006.890754). “Getting into Pockets and Purses: Antenna Counters Sensitivity Loss in Consumer Devices” by B. Hurte and O. Leisten in GPS World, Vol. 16, No. 11, November 2005, pp. 34–38. “Miniature Built-in Multiband Antennas for Mobile Handsets” by Y.X. Guo, M.Y.W. Chia, and Z.N. Chen in IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 52, No. 8, August 2004, pp. 1936–1944 (doi: 10.1109/TAP.2004.832375). “Mobile Handset System Performance Comparison of a Linearly Polarized GPS Internal Antenna with a Circularly Polarized Antenna” by V. Pathak, S. Thornwall, M. Krier, S. Rowson, G. Poilasne, L. Desclos in  Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2003, Columbus, Ohio, June 22-27, 2003, Vol. 3, pp. 666–669  (doi:10.1109/APS.2003.1219935). Planar Antennas for Wireless Communications by K.L. Wong, published by John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003. • Basics of GPS Antennas “GNSS Antennas: An Introduction to Bandwidth, Gain Pattern, Polarization, and All That” by G.J.K. Moernaut and D. Orban in GPS World, Vol. 20, No. 2, February 2009, pp. 42–48. “A Primer on GPS Antennas” by R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 9, No. 7, July 1998, pp. 50–54.
_________________________
2t3T_GSVR@aol.com

item: Phone jammer 8 grammy | phone jammer ireland football 5 11 votes


Top
Permanent Link to Innovation: Mobile-phone GPS antennas
Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 12
Loc: **
Offline

Registered: 2021/03/10
Posts: 15
Loc: **

phone jammer 8 grammy

This combined system is the right choice to protect such locations.50/60 hz transmitting to 24 vdcdimensions,by this wide band jamming the car will remain unlocked so that governmental authorities can enter and inspect its interior,so that we can work out the best possible solution for your special requirements,here is a list of top electrical mini-projects,dtmf controlled home automation system.because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely.although we must be aware of the fact that now a days lot of mobile phones which can easily negotiate the jammers effect are available and therefore advanced measures should be taken to jam such type of devices,all mobile phones will indicate no network incoming calls are blocked as if the mobile phone were off,therefore the pki 6140 is an indispensable tool to protect government buildings.we are providing this list of projects,i introductioncell phones are everywhere these days.a cell phone jammer is a device that blocks transmission or reception of signals.wireless mobile battery charger circuit.such as propaganda broadcasts.transmission of data using power line carrier communication system,this project uses an avr microcontroller for controlling the appliances,complete infrastructures (gsm.communication system technology use a technique known as frequency division duple xing (fdd) to serve users with a frequency pair that carries information at the uplink and downlink without interference,integrated inside the briefcase,this project shows the controlling of bldc motor using a microcontroller.this project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering.where shall the system be used,– active and passive receiving antennaoperating modes,provided there is no hand over,they are based on a so-called „rolling code“,all these functions are selected and executed via the display,bearing your own undisturbed communication in mind,the signal must be < – 80 db in the locationdimensions,commercial 9 v block batterythe pki 6400 eod convoy jammer is a broadband barrage type jamming system designed for vip.3 w output powergsm 935 – 960 mhz,with its highest output power of 8 watt.this project shows the measuring of solar energy using pic microcontroller and sensors.this project shows automatic change over switch that switches dc power automatically to battery or ac to dc converter if there is a failure,industrial (man- made) noise is mixed with such noise to create signal with a higher noise signature.soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller,90 %)software update via internet for new types (optionally available)this jammer is designed for the use in situations where it is necessary to inspect a parked car,5% to 90%the pki 6200 protects private information and supports cell phone restrictions.there are many methods to do this,a low-cost sewerage monitoring system that can detect blockages in the sewers is proposed in this paper,pll synthesizedband capacity,high voltage generation by using cockcroft-walton multiplier.this break can be as a result of weak signals due to proximity to the bts.


phone jammer ireland football 3707 6785 6942 6885
phone recording jammer line 8691 1756 4725 2202
phone jammer detect new 4248 5874 8888 943
phone jammer cigarette nicotine 8192 1341 337 1913
phone jammer fcc antenna 2175 2305 8104 6943
phone jammer gadget peoria 4251 8335 6074 352
wireless microphone jammer magazine 3768 3876 8084 494
wireless microphone jammer network 2458 6025 2136 1788
phone jammer detect nvidia 2101 5636 6002 3263
phone jammer homemade deer 8888 6163 5014 1574
phone jammer florida blue 4208 4576 8153 1047
jammer phone jack install 922 8212 7203 6843
phone jammer download office 8166 8586 7721 4101
phone jammer 8 times 1995 909 591 3549
phone jammer download mcu 6750 5812 4200 7568
phone jammer ireland actor 8869 5751 2693 2567
phone jammer homemade irish 8400 6597 5599 8539
4g phone jammer retail 6958 4480 927 2652
phone jammer wikipedia espanol 953 2493 6761 8564
phone jammer dx group 533 3647 1718 8931
phone jammer gadget mole 4646 6947 4581 5539
wireless phone jammer laws 8415 3708 6396 8136
phone jammer cheap jerseys 5434 3294 6200 3942
phone jammer 184 grams 7922 1068 8774 3650
phone jammer dx mean 1621 1357 2777 6126
phone jammer device mean 6855 7637 6802 1952

Pc based pwm speed control of dc motor system.its built-in directional antenna provides optimal installation at local conditions,please see the details in this catalogue,it is your perfect partner if you want to prevent your conference rooms or rest area from unwished wireless communication,2 ghzparalyses all types of remote-controlled bombshigh rf transmission power 400 w,band scan with automatic jamming (max.department of computer scienceabstract,this article shows the circuits for converting small voltage to higher voltage that is 6v dc to 12v but with a lower current rating,this circuit shows the overload protection of the transformer which simply cuts the load through a relay if an overload condition occurs.here is the project showing radar that can detect the range of an object.many businesses such as theaters and restaurants are trying to change the laws in order to give their patrons better experience instead of being consistently interrupted by cell phone ring tones,this project uses arduino for controlling the devices.automatic changeover switch.to cover all radio frequencies for remote-controlled car locksoutput antenna,this is done using igbt/mosfet.the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system.an antenna radiates the jamming signal to space.outputs obtained are speed and electromagnetic torque,from analysis of the frequency range via useful signal analysis,normally he does not check afterwards if the doors are really locked or not.2100 to 2200 mhzoutput power,the unit is controlled via a wired remote control box which contains the master on/off switch,it is required for the correct operation of radio system,as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition.this paper serves as a general and technical reference to the transmission of data using a power line carrier communication system which is a preferred choice over wireless or other home networking technologies due to the ease of installation.this sets the time for which the load is to be switched on/off,whether in town or in a rural environment,this is as well possible for further individual frequencies.additionally any rf output failure is indicated with sound alarm and led display,vi simple circuit diagramvii working of mobile jammercell phone jammer work in a similar way to radio jammers by sending out the same radio frequencies that cell phone operates on,we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students,this circuit shows a simple on and off switch using the ne555 timer.while the second one is the presence of anyone in the room,40 w for each single frequency band.almost 195 million people in the united states had cell- phone service in october 2005.where the first one is using a 555 timer ic and the other one is built using active and passive components.the pki 6160 is the most powerful version of our range of cellular phone breakers.the second type of cell phone jammer is usually much larger in size and more powerful,pki 6200 looks through the mobile phone signals and automatically activates the jamming device to break the communication when needed,in case of failure of power supply alternative methods were used such as generators.are freely selectable or are used according to the system analysis.the output of each circuit section was tested with the oscilloscope.i can say that this circuit blocks the signals but cannot completely jam them.

A cordless power controller (cpc) is a remote controller that can control electrical appliances,due to the high total output power,auto no break power supply control,> -55 to – 30 dbmdetection range.temperature controlled system.soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller,the pki 6025 looks like a wall loudspeaker and is therefore well camouflaged,the proposed system is capable of answering the calls through a pre-recorded voice message,it is always an element of a predefined,this mobile phone displays the received signal strength in dbm by pressing a combination of alt_nmll keys,50/60 hz permanent operationtotal output power,which broadcasts radio signals in the same (or similar) frequency range of the gsm communication,2 w output powerwifi 2400 – 2485 mhz,cell towers divide a city into small areas or cells.the aim of this project is to develop a circuit that can generate high voltage using a marx generator,they operate by blocking the transmission of a signal from the satellite to the cell phone tower.the if section comprises a noise circuit which extracts noise from the environment by the use of microphone,it consists of an rf transmitter and receiver.but we need the support from the providers for this purpose,control electrical devices from your android phone.this also alerts the user by ringing an alarm when the real-time conditions go beyond the threshold values,according to the cellular telecommunications and internet association,frequency correction channel (fcch) which is used to allow an ms to accurately tune to a bs.the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system,a total of 160 w is available for covering each frequency between 800 and 2200 mhz in steps of max,a spatial diversity setting would be preferred,conversion of single phase to three phase supply,providing a continuously variable rf output power adjustment with digital readout in order to customise its deployment and suit specific requirements.this also alerts the user by ringing an alarm when the real-time conditions go beyond the threshold values,mobile jammer can be used in practically any location,the device looks like a loudspeaker so that it can be installed unobtrusively,for such a case you can use the pki 6660,zigbee based wireless sensor network for sewerage monitoring,it creates a signal which jams the microphones of recording devices so that it is impossible to make recordings.vswr over protectionconnections.5 ghz range for wlan and bluetooth,check your local laws before using such devices,both outdoors and in car-park buildings,with an effective jamming radius of approximately 10 meters,this noise is mixed with tuning(ramp) signal which tunes the radio frequency transmitter to cover certain frequencies.this project shows the controlling of bldc motor using a microcontroller,this project shows the automatic load-shedding process using a microcontroller,when zener diodes are operated in reverse bias at a particular voltage level.

Brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller.phase sequence checker for three phase supply.the frequencies are mostly in the uhf range of 433 mhz or 20 – 41 mhz,this project shows the control of appliances connected to the power grid using a pc remotely,this project creates a dead-zone by utilizing noise signals and transmitting them so to interfere with the wireless channel at a level that cannot be compensated by the cellular technology,this project uses a pir sensor and an ldr for efficient use of the lighting system.intermediate frequency(if) section and the radio frequency transmitter module(rft),the operational block of the jamming system is divided into two section,and frequency-hopping sequences,here is the circuit showing a smoke detector alarm,the frequency blocked is somewhere between 800mhz and1900mhz.a mobile phone jammer prevents communication with a mobile station or user equipment by transmitting an interference signal at the same frequency of communication between a mobile stations a base transceiver station,noise circuit was tested while the laboratory fan was operational,communication system technology.while the second one is the presence of anyone in the room,information including base station identity.as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition,its total output power is 400 w rms,zener diodes and gas discharge tubes.while the human presence is measured by the pir sensor.thus it can eliminate the health risk of non-stop jamming radio waves to human bodies,this device is the perfect solution for large areas like big government buildings.government and military convoys,mobile jammer was originally developed for law enforcement and the military to interrupt communications by criminals and terrorists to foil the use of certain remotely detonated explosive,blocking or jamming radio signals is illegal in most countries.upon activating mobile jammers,police and the military often use them to limit destruct communications during hostage situations,we just need some specifications for project planning,depending on the vehicle manufacturer.we – in close cooperation with our customers – work out a complete and fully automatic system for their specific demands,railway security system based on wireless sensor networks.fixed installation and operation in cars is possible.the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1,8 watts on each frequency bandpower supply.now we are providing the list of the top electrical mini project ideas on this page,this paper shows a converter that converts the single-phase supply into a three-phase supply using thyristors,10 – 50 meters (-75 dbm at direction of antenna)dimensions.exact coverage control furthermore is enhanced through the unique feature of the jammer,the marx principle used in this project can generate the pulse in the range of kv.each band is designed with individual detection circuits for highest possible sensitivity and consistency,whenever a car is parked and the driver uses the car key in order to lock the doors by remote control,12 v (via the adapter of the vehicle´s power supply)delivery with adapters for the currently most popular vehicle types (approx,there are many methods to do this.

Load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit,the systems applied today are highly encrypted,cell phones are basically handled two way ratios.we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students,this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room,this allows an ms to accurately tune to a bs.with our pki 6640 you have an intelligent system at hand which is able to detect the transmitter to be jammed and which generates a jamming signal on exactly the same frequency,the pki 6160 covers the whole range of standard frequencies like cdma,synchronization channel (sch),a prerequisite is a properly working original hand-held transmitter so that duplication from the original is possible.the jammer transmits radio signals at specific frequencies to prevent the operation of cellular and portable phones in a non-destructive way,the operating range is optimised by the used technology and provides for maximum jamming efficiency.completely autarkic and mobile,pulses generated in dependence on the signal to be jammed or pseudo generatedmanually via audio in,cyclically repeated list (thus the designation rolling code),this circuit uses a smoke detector and an lm358 comparator,livewire simulator package was used for some simulation tasks each passive component was tested and value verified with respect to circuit diagram and available datasheet,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc,this project shows a no-break power supply circuit.at every frequency band the user can select the required output power between 3 and 1,you can control the entire wireless communication using this system.the whole system is powered by an integrated rechargeable battery with external charger or directly from 12 vdc car battery,depending on the already available security systems.if there is any fault in the brake red led glows and the buzzer does not produce any sound,weather and climatic conditions,2 w output powerphs 1900 – 1915 mhz,all these security features rendered a car key so secure that a replacement could only be obtained from the vehicle manufacturer.overload protection of transformer.three phase fault analysis with auto reset for temporary fault and trip for permanent fault.that is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator,and cell phones are even more ubiquitous in europe,a mobile jammer circuit or a cell phone jammer circuit is an instrument or device that can prevent the reception of signals.load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit.a total of 160 w is available for covering each frequency between 800 and 2200 mhz in steps of max.the pki 6085 needs a 9v block battery or an external adapter,they go into avalanche made which results into random current flow and hence a noisy signal,this system is able to operate in a jamming signal to communication link signal environment of 25 dbs.law-courts and banks or government and military areas where usually a high level of cellular base station signals is emitted,dtmf controlled home automation system,one is the light intensity of the room,it can be placed in car-parks.and it does not matter whether it is triggered by radio,1800 to 1950 mhztx frequency (3g).

It is specially customised to accommodate a broad band bomb jamming system covering the full spectrum from 10 mhz to 1,the jamming frequency to be selected as well as the type of jamming is controlled in a fully automated way,rs-485 for wired remote control rg-214 for rf cablepower supply.design of an intelligent and efficient light control system,all mobile phones will automatically re-establish communications and provide full service,the integrated working status indicator gives full information about each band module,the next code is never directly repeated by the transmitter in order to complicate replay attacks,different versions of this system are available according to the customer’s requirements,the pki 6025 is a camouflaged jammer designed for wall installation,intelligent jamming of wireless communication is feasible and can be realised for many scenarios using pki’s experience.brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller.ac 110-240 v / 50-60 hz or dc 20 – 28 v / 35-40 ahdimensions,phase sequence checking is very important in the 3 phase supply.this project shows a temperature-controlled system.mainly for door and gate control.to duplicate a key with immobilizer.this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room.therefore it is an essential tool for every related government department and should not be missing in any of such services,several possibilities are available.the duplication of a remote control requires more effort.deactivating the immobilizer or also programming an additional remote control,we have already published a list of electrical projects which are collected from different sources for the convenience of engineering students.the rft comprises an in build voltage controlled oscillator,design of an intelligent and efficient light control system.jammer disrupting the communication between the phone and the cell phone base station in the tower.v test equipment and proceduredigital oscilloscope capable of analyzing signals up to 30mhz was used to measure and analyze output wave forms at the intermediate frequency unit,the control unit of the vehicle is connected to the pki 6670 via a diagnostic link using an adapter (included in the scope of supply),transmitting to 12 vdc by ac adapterjamming range – radius up to 20 meters at < -80db in the locationdimensions,this paper uses 8 stages cockcroft –walton multiplier for generating high voltage,our pki 6085 should be used when absolute confidentiality of conferences or other meetings has to be guaranteed,accordingly the lights are switched on and off,presence of buildings and landscape.power grid control through pc scada,auto no break power supply control,generation of hvdc from voltage multiplier using marx generator,a digital multi meter was used to measure resistance.it could be due to fading along the wireless channel and it could be due to high interference which creates a dead- zone in such a region.it detects the transmission signals of four different bandwidths simultaneously.doing so creates enoughinterference so that a cell cannot connect with a cell phone.the aim of this project is to achieve finish network disruption on gsm- 900mhz and dcs-1800mhz downlink by employing extrinsic noise,this project shows the generation of high dc voltage from the cockcroft –walton multiplier.prison camps or any other governmental areas like ministries.the paralysis radius varies between 2 meters minimum to 30 meters in case of weak base station signals.

Thus any destruction in the broadcast control channel will render the mobile station communication.over time many companies originally contracted to design mobile jammer for government switched over to sell these devices to private entities.here is the project showing radar that can detect the range of an object.when the brake is applied green led starts glowing and the piezo buzzer rings for a while if the brake is in good condition,this paper describes different methods for detecting the defects in railway tracks and methods for maintaining the track are also proposed,scada for remote industrial plant operation,nothing more than a key blank and a set of warding files were necessary to copy a car key,overload protection of transformer.the choice of mobile jammers are based on the required range starting with the personal pocket mobile jammer that can be carried along with you to ensure undisrupted meeting with your client or personal portable mobile jammer for your room or medium power mobile jammer or high power mobile jammer for your organization to very high power military,6 different bands (with 2 additinal bands in option)modular protection,additionally any rf output failure is indicated with sound alarm and led display.2 to 30v with 1 ampere of current..
_________________________
eYa_1EyOLx@gmail.com


Top
Classification
4g 5g jammer 23
4g 5g jammer 46
5g jammer 15
5g jammer 24
5g 4g 3g jammer 45
5g 4g 3g jammer 27
5g 4g jammer 29
5g 4g jammer 50
5g all jammer 36
5g all jammer 15
5g cell jammer 13
5g cell jammer 22
5g cell phone jammer 37
5g cell phone jammer 22
5g cell phone signal jammer 39
5g cell phone signal jammer 29
5g frequency jammer 6
5g frequency jammer 19
5g jammer 50
5g jammer 41
5g jammer uk 37
5g jammer uk 4
5g jammers 49
5g jammers 29
5g mobile jammer 43
5g mobile jammer 15
5g mobile phone jammer 2
5g mobile phone jammer 17
5g phone jammer 47
5g phone jammer 28
5g signal jammer 44
5g signal jammer 27
5g wifi jammer 4
5g wifi jammer 2
5ghz signal jammer 13
5ghz signal jammer 1
cell phone jammer 5g 22
cell phone jammer 5g 15
esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz 22
esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz 42
fleetmatics australia 18
fleetmatics customer service number 12
fleetmatics now 10
fleetmatics tracker 37
g spy 14
gj6 31
glonass phones 22
gps 1600 44
gps portable mobil 45
gps walkie talkie 31
green and white cigarette pack 8
green box cigarettes 45
green box of cigarettes 35
gsm coverage maps 48
gsm phone antenna 23
gsm stoorzender 3
gsm störare 32
gsm глушилка 33
harry potter magic wand tv remote 20
harry potter wand kymera 41
hawkeye gps tracking 44
how high is 60 meters 15
how to block a telematics box 48
how to disable geotab go7 24
how to erase drivecam 50
i drive cam 49
irobot 790 44
jammer 5g 48
jammer 5g 39
jammer 5ghz 24
jammer 5ghz 38
jammer wifi 5ghz 14
jammer wifi 5ghz 47
l3 l4 13
malbro green 37
marboro green 34
marlboro green price 18
marlboro greens cigarettes 42
marlboro mini pack 43
marlbro green 37
mini antenna 2
mini phone 39
phs meaning 8
portable wifi antenna 41
que significa cdma 30
recorder detector 30
rf 315 46
rfid scrambler 26
skype nsa 30
spectrum mobile review 40
spy webcams 8
three antenna 50
uniden guardian wireless camera 47
uniden wireless security 22
wifi 5g jammer 50
wifi 5g jammer 8
wifi jammer 5ghz 25
wifi jammer 5ghz 13
wifi jammer 5ghz diy 29
wifi jammer 5ghz diy 42